Please enter your email to view this deck.
Notes: Estimated from ~1.0B U.S. physician office visits and a modeled share of encounter time spent on history intake.
Sources: CDC FastStats; Young et al. time-motion study.
spent on history intake before high-value clinical work begins.
the same core questions are asked across millions of visits.
Replacing manual data entry and repetitive questions with multimodal intelligence, giving physicians their time back.
Voice, video, and chat capture richer clinical data than forms or voice-only AI.
Physicians define the questions. Outputs are reviewable. Every interaction is auditable.
Chart-ready summaries fit into existing clinical workflows before the encounter starts.
What Kaiser Permanente physicians said
“More complete and accurate than what we typically get from manual intake.”
— KP Orthopedics physician
“A few levels ahead of the others — the visual inspection is unlike anything we’ve seen.”
— KP Orthopedics physician
“I see real potential to expand this across specialties — this isn’t just an orthopedics tool.”
— KP Chief Innovation Officer
Copy and paste from a questionnaire, protocol, PDF, email, or EHR export.
A one-tap link arrives with the usual SMS reminder. No app download.
Reminder: Your appointment is tomorrow at 2:30 PM. Please complete your intake here:
A natural, conversational experience designed to feel familiar and easy.
Chart-ready before the patient walks in. HPI, PMH, SH — all structured.
Flat per-physician SaaS subscription. No per-encounter fees, no implementation cost.
11 min saved × 15 encounters/day ≈ $3,000+/mo in recovered physician capacity vs. $600/mo cost.
Why $600/mo is a no-brainer for providers
11 min saved per encounter × 15 encounters/day gives each physician nearly 3 hours back.
Recovered time translates to additional patient slots per day at ~$150–200 each.
Software-only delivery with no per-encounter cost. Pure SaaS unit economics.
Start with structured specialties, then extend the same engine across more care moments.
AI-powered intake & clinical workflow across ~1M US physicians
~120K physicians in structured-intake specialties at ~$15K blended ACV
~30K physicians across 50–100 health systems
Scribes and scheduling got automated. History intake? Still manual for 1M+ physicians.
63% report burnout; admin burden is the #1 cause. Intake is the first bottleneck of every visit.
They work after the physician walks in. Pre-visit is a different product: patient-facing, asynchronous, multimodal.
They digitised the clipboard. No clinical reasoning, no follow-up logic. Adding AI is a rewrite, not a feature.
Specialty-specific logic, multimodal perception, and chart-ready output make this a product, not a bolt-on feature.


Medical Advisory Board